Tag Archives: indepth

The Case for the Resurrection

To begin, we must be entirely clear on what the case for the Resurrection is not. No one is arguing that some historically reliable documents report a resurrection, and that we should therefore believe that a resurrection occurred. Rather, the historical method is used to establish certain facts, and a miracle is inferred as the best explanation of those facts.

Read more
Posted in Historical Jesus | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

There’s Probably No God – a response to Richard Dawkins

In his best-selling book The God Delusion (TGD)[1], Richard Dawkins claims that belief in God is not only mistaken but irrational, especially in the light of modern science. He criticises belief in God from many angles, but in what he considers to be the central argument of his book, he claims to have shown that ‘God almost certainly does not exist’ (TGD, p.

Read more
Posted in Existence of God, Science and Christianity | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on There’s Probably No God – a response to Richard Dawkins