Tag Archives: The Moral Argument
New Atheism’s Moral Meltdown (Part 2)
One Coyne with Two Sides?
In our original article we wrote “Of course, [Coyne] believes in moral obligations and the significance of the individual.” It seems we were much too generous, for his commitment to moral reality is far from clear.
… Read more
Posted in Existence of God, Quick Thoughts
Tagged Can We Be Good Without God, Gnus, God and Evidence, Good and Evil, Jerry Coyne, McAtheism, Right and Wrong, The Moral Argument
Comments Off on New Atheism’s Moral Meltdown (Part 2)
Meaning, Morality and Jerry Coyne’s World
After Lawrence Krauss, Jerry Coyne seems to be the most likely candidate to inherit Richard Dawkins’ status as patron saint of New Atheism. He certainly has the qualifications – he is respected scientist who communicates complicated ideas with enviable ease. His recent dispute with New York Times columnist Ross Douthat reveals that he has none of the disqualifications: his worldview is far from coherent, and he is not above concealing an unconvincing argument behind bluff and bluster.
… Read more
Posted in Quick Thoughts
Tagged Can We Be Good Without God, Debate, Gnus, Good and Evil, Jerry Coyne, McAtheism, New Atheism, Right and Wrong, The Moral Argument
Comments Off on Meaning, Morality and Jerry Coyne’s World